Fox is invoking the First Amendment in its opposition to a challenge to its character qualifications to hold a Federal Communications Commission broadcast license.
The Media and Democracy Project (MAD), citing Fox's settlement of the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit over election misinformation, last month challenged the renewal of Fox’s WTXF Philadelphia, and by extension the company’s character qualifications for holding any TV station licenses at all, according to nexttv.com.
The FCC is authorized to review a license applicant’s “citizenship, character, technical, financial and other qualifications.”
According to a copy of its opposition to that challenge, filed with the FCC Wednesday (August 2), MAD has failed to make a case that Fox's license renewal should be denied and is treading dangerous ground.
While Fox concedes that broadcast speech has lesser protection from regulation than other content, thanks to the Supreme Court decision in the Red Lion case. But it says that in the context of license renewals, the FCC has signaled it will tread lightly, a precedent it says MAD does not recognize or respect.
Fox says that, First Amendment concerns aside, MAD has failed to articulate a claim against Fox TV Stations or WTXF, known on-air as Fox 29 Philadelphia. As to the lawsuit, it says: “MAD attempts to make much of an unrelated, partially adjudicated civil defamation claim that concerned a cable network under common ownership with FTS. Commission precedent is clear, however, that an unrelated civil matter has no bearing on Fox 29 Philadelphia’s license renewal application.”
By its own count, Fox owns owns 29 full-power TV stations, including in 14 of the top 15 biggest markets, and owns duopolies — two stations — in the top three markets in the country, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago.
No comments:
Post a Comment