The joint US-Israel military operation against Iran began Saturday morning. President Trump announced the start of “major combat operations” (sometimes referenced in coverage as part of “Operation Epic Fury”), describing it as a sustained campaign targeting Iran’s military sites, nuclear program, government facilities, and in some reports, regime figures. Israel framed its role as a “preemptive strike” after months of joint planning with the US, following failed nuclear negotiations and prior escalations (including strikes in June 2025).
All news outlets provided immediate, prominent live updates or breaking coverage within hours of the strikes beginning, focusing on official statements, targets, potential duration (possibly days), and Iranian retaliation risks.
Coverage across outlets was extensive and breaking-news oriented, with live blogs, video embeds of Trump’s Truth Social announcement, and timelines. Differences appeared mainly in framing, word choice, emphasis on justification vs. risks, and tone. Broadcast networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) leaned factual/neutral. Cable outlets showed more variation.
ABC News (abcnews.go.com)Tone: Neutral and factual.
Live updates headline the story as “Iran live updates: Trump announces ‘major combat operations’; could last for days.” Reports explicitly state “The U.S. and Israel have launched a joint attack on Iran” and cite IDF descriptions of strikes on “dozens of military targets” as part of a “broad, coordinated, and joint attack.” Earlier contextual pieces discuss Trump’s buildup and options (limited strike vs. sustained operation), but today’s coverage sticks closely to official timelines, Trump quotes, and operational details without strong editorial language. No heavy emphasis on civilian impacts or criticism; presents the action as a response to nuclear threats.
NBC News (nbcnews.com)Tone: Neutral-factual with some emphasis on scale and regime-change implications.
Live blog titled “Live updates: U.S. military begins ‘major combat operations in Iran,’ Trump says.” Describes “joint U.S.-Israeli ‘Operation Epic Fury’” attacks on “military and security targets,” notes Israel’s “preemptive strike,” and explicitly states the offensive aims at “removing the Iranian regime.” Includes videos of Trump and details on U.S. targeting of ballistic missiles/nuclear sites vs. Israel’s focus on leaders. References prior June 2025 actions for context. Straightforward but highlights the ambitious scope and potential for prolonged fighting.
CBS News (cbsnews.com)Tone: Neutral and procedural:
Live updates: “Live Updates: U.S. and Israel attack Iran, with Trump confirming ‘major combat operations.’” Uses both “attack” and Israel’s “preemptive strike” language, quoting Trump on defending America and preventing a nuclear threat. Frames the operation as following weeks of failed talks and threats over Iran’s nuclear program and protests. Includes full Trump statement and operational details (e.g., “massive and ongoing operation”). Very fact-driven, with minimal opinion or alarmist framing.
Fox News (foxnews.com)Tone: Supportive and affirmative toward the US/Israel action.
Live coverage: “Israel, US launch attack on Iran as Trump announces ‘major combat operations.’” Repeatedly calls it a “preemptive” operation in response to “Iran’s aggression” and “mass terror.” Highlights “historic action” by Trump, quotes him extensively (“It’s been mass terror and we’re not going to put up with it any longer”), and notes targeting of Iranian leaders (e.g., Supreme Leader Khamenei). Emphasizes justification, coordination, and strength against the regime; little focus on risks or Iranian civilian perspectives in top snippets.
CNN (cnn.com)Tone: Neutral-factual with descriptive detail on immediate effects.
Live updates: “US, Israel attack Iran in ‘preemptive strike,’ Trump posts video on Truth Social.” Describes coordinated “months of close and joint planning,” daylight strikes on Tehran (with “plumes of smoke” and residents sheltering), targeting of supreme leader/president/military heads, and US plans for “several days of attacks.” Notes Trump’s “massive and ongoing” campaign and Iranian retaliation preparations. Balanced reporting: includes Israeli/US statements alongside observable impacts in Iran.
MSNOW (msnbc.com)Tone: Not prominently covered in immediate web breaking-news format (as of searches).
Site-specific searches returned no dedicated live updates or breaking articles on today’s February 28, 2026 operation; top results referenced prior 2025 strikes and were largely opinion/analysis pieces. Those earlier pieces framed similar US/Israel actions as a “massive gamble,” potential “regime-change war,” or risky escalation driven by Trump/Netanyahu, often questioning advisers and highlighting dangers of wider conflict.
Summary of overall patterns: All outlets with active coverage used similar core facts and official terminology (“preemptive strike” from Israel, Trump’s “major combat operations”). Broadcast networks stayed the most neutral and timeline-focused. Fox leaned most supportive/justificatory. CNN added vivid on-the-ground details. MSNBC’s web presence was the least reactive on this specific launch.
No outlet appeared overtly celebratory of war or alarmist about imminent catastrophe in the initial reports; coverage centered on official narratives, with varying degrees of context on nuclear threats vs. escalation risks. This reflects standard breaking-news dynamics for a major Middle East military development. Events are fast-moving, so tones could shift with new developments (e.g., Iranian retaliation or casualties)..
Broader Themes in Reporting:
- Objectives — Outlets quoted Trump and Israeli leaders on eliminating nuclear threats, missile programs, and existential dangers to Israel/U.S. allies. Some noted this as more extensive than prior strikes (e.g., U.S. hits on three nuclear sites in 2025).
- Retaliation Risks — Heavy focus on expected Iranian responses, Iranian state media reports of damage, and civil defense measures in Israel.
- Context — Many tied it to stalled U.S.-Iran nuclear talks, recent protests/crackdowns in Iran, and the fragile 2025 ceasefire.
- Wikipedia and Encyclopedic Entries — Rapidly updated pages (e.g., "2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran") codenamed operations like "Roaring Lion" and "Shield of Judah," with ongoing status and unknown casualties noted.
Overall, coverage has been fast-moving and visuals-driven (e.g., smoke plumes in Tehran, sirens in Israel), with a mix of official statements, anonymous U.S./Israeli sources, and on-the-ground reports. Outlets across the spectrum (Western mainstream, regional like Al Jazeera) converge on the facts of the strikes occurring but differ in emphasis—e.g., more on preemption and threats from pro-Western sources, versus diplomatic fallout and regional escalation from others.
As events unfold rapidly today, expect continued live updates and evolving details on damage, casualties, and Iranian reactions.