The Pentagon late Friday defended its new restrictions on journalists in a court filing, describing them as a reasonable measure to protect national security while still allowing media access. The filing responds to a First Amendment lawsuit brought by The New York Times in December.
The Defense Department stated that the policy aims “to secure the Pentagon and stop activity that could compromise national security.” It provides “explicit and clear standards for conduct” at the building.The rules, implemented in October, require reporters to sign a detailed 21-page form limiting journalistic activities, such as soliciting story tips or making unauthorized inquiries to Pentagon sources.
Noncompliance risks revocation of press passes.
The Times claims the policy violates journalists' First Amendment rights by restricting their ability to ask questions of government employees and report beyond official statements. It also alleges a Fifth Amendment due process violation, arguing the department has “unfettered” discretion to revoke credentials even for lawful newsgathering.
Under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, shortly after his confirmation, the Pentagon curtailed media privileges: some major outlets were removed from on-site workspaces, and journalists face limits on unescorted movement in the building. In October, grounds for revoking passes were formalized.
Dozens of journalists refused to sign the new rules and surrendered their passes but continue covering the military. The department has welcomed a revamped press corps including pro-Trump commentators and influencers.
Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell defended the shift in an October X post: “Americans have largely abandoned digesting their news through the lens of activists who masquerade as journalists in the mainstream media. We look forward to beginning a fresh relationship with members of the new Pentagon press corps.”

