Last week, both The New York Times (NYT) and The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that Elon Musk, Tesla and SpaceX CEO and a top Trump advisor, was slated for a Pentagon briefing on U.S. military plans for a potential war with China.
The NYT (March 20) detailed a Friday, March 21 briefing in “the Tank” with 20-30 slides on China-specific strategies, citing unnamed officials. The WSJ (March 20) confirmed a “top-secret” briefing requested by Musk, tied to his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) role. Both highlighted conflicts of interest due to Tesla’s China ties and SpaceX’s $11.8 billion in U.S. contracts.
The reports triggered backlash. Trump called them “fake” on Truth Social, insisting China wasn’t discussed. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Musk, who dubbed the NYT “propaganda” on X, said the visit was about innovation, not war plans. Post-coverage, the briefing was downgraded to unclassified. The controversy underscored Musk’s growing influence and raised questions about his access amid his business interests, though the administration denied the original intent.\Both outlets framed the story as evidence of Musk’s growing influence under Trump, who has leaned on him heavily since Musk spent over $250 million on his 2024 campaign. His DOGE role, aimed at slashing federal spending, has already stirred controversy, and this incident amplified concerns about a civilian contractor accessing some of the military’s “most closely guarded secrets.” Experts quoted in the reports, like Todd Harrison from the American Enterprise Institute in Newsweek, called it a potential “contract protest” issue, given SpaceX’s defense ties.
On Saturday, the NYT reported the briefing was scuttled or reframed after the media exposure. Trump acknowledged Musk’s China ties as a reason he shouldn’t see such plans, a rare nod to conflict concerns, saying, “You wouldn’t show it to a businessman.”
The Pentagon visit went ahead, but officials insisted it focused on innovation, not war strategy.
No comments:
Post a Comment