Saga Communications does not subscribe to Arbitron’s ratings.
Arbitron claims obtained copies of the ratings “which were
reproduced and circulated among its personnel.
These unauthorized copies were then used on a regular and systematic
basis by Defendants for various purposes including setting advertising rates
charged by Defendants’ radio stations and making programming decisions…
Defendants decided whether to give their employees bonuses and if so, the size
of those bonuses based on the station’s performance in the Arbitron
ratings. This system was so widespread,
open and notorious at Defendants’ radio stations, that station personnel
including senior management commonly referred to the system as the ‘Arbitron
Bonus.’”
Saga Communications has yet to publicly comment.
Consultant Jaye Albright says this one is going to be worth
watching, and yet most Arbitron legal actions against non-subscribing stations
are kept under wraps, so we may never know the outcome in court.
ALSO READ: "Hardball" from Jaye Albright's Breakfast Blog. Click Here.
No comments:
Post a Comment