No successor has been named, according to nytimes.com. Genachowski’s departure, on
the heels of the resignation earlier this week of Robert M. McDowell, a
Republican commissioner since 2006, will leave the agency with only three of
five board spots filled, although Democrats will retain a 2-to-1 majority.
READ CHAIRMAN GENACHOWSKI'S REMARKS: Scroll below
The decision brings to an end a tumultuous term that has seen bruising battles over the openness of the Internet to the reform of the nation's major telephone subsidy.
READ CHAIRMAN GENACHOWSKI'S REMARKS: Scroll below
The decision brings to an end a tumultuous term that has seen bruising battles over the openness of the Internet to the reform of the nation's major telephone subsidy.
The decision to resign has been expected for months. The
Democrat’s decision would come in the same week that senior GOP Commissioner
Robert McDowell announced his plan to leave.
Nominations for critical agencies like the FCC are often
paired, making it easier to get the confirmation through the Senate if there is
one Republican and one Democrat.
Genachowski took over as chairman in 2009 and pushed the
agency to look at telecommunications differently with broadband supplanting old
technologies like broadcasting and telephone service.
He managed to win approval for the first major overhaul of
the Universal Service Fund, pushed through controversial network neutrality
rules and popularized the idea of an incentive auction that would move some TV
broadcasters off their channels and open them up for advanced, high-speed
services.
Genachowski also oversaw a series of telecommunications
deals that helped reshape the landscape. The Comcast/NBC-Universal deal was
approved by the FCC on his watch, as was a deal that allowed Verizon to
purchase the wireless licenses held by a consortium of cable companies. Most
recently, the commission approved the deal that allowed T-Mobile to buy a
controlling stake in MetroPCS.
He also pushed the commission to kill AT&T's attempt to
buy T-Mobile despite GOP objections.
No comments:
Post a Comment