Radio Has Worries Over FCC's Mandator DIRS Reporting

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed a requirement for broadcasters to file reports in the Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) during emergencies. 

However, this proposal hasn’t received much support. While the FCC believes that too many stations, especially small and medium-sized ones, choose not to voluntarily file DIRS reports, the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) argues that mandatory reporting could hinder broadcasters’ ability to serve the public during emergencies.

The FCC typically only hears from 20% to 35% of stations, leaving a gap in their awareness of broadcasters’ status during disasters. NAB contends that broadcasters’ resources would be better allocated elsewhere, and mandatory reporting might distract them from their core mission without providing discernable public benefit. Unlike wireless providers, radio and television stations cannot pass on the costs of additional regulatory requirements to subscribers. Any funds required for mandatory DIRS reporting could reduce broadcasters’ ability to produce local news and other valuable content, including informing the public during crises1.=

Furthermore, broadcasters have unique responsibilities during emergencies. They must gather and report timely news and information as situations unfold. Adding paperwork obligations could distract station staff from this critical role and potentially risk harm to lives or property. Interestingly, NAB points out that filing DIRS reports rarely leads to government assistance that helps stations maintain or restore service. Instead of more paperwork, the FCC should focus on assisting broadcasters in gaining access to fuel and facilities during disasters1.