Some radio folks think that local is their salvation. This
story may change your mind.
I was in one of my smaller markets last week. One of the
stations in the cluster is a Class A CHR.
Their competition, a 100kw
Clear Channel Premium Choice CHR that not only sounds pretty good but
also runs the syndicated "Dave and Jimmy" morning show.
I do not work for the CHR, (I'm the AC guy) but the station
owner knows me and knows that I always
have an opinion (lol). He asked how I thought his station sounded. I told him it was "just
ok".
He knows that "just ok" from me means I think they
stink! It lacked "differentiation" from the other CHR and also played
a lot of unfamiliar music. Most important, the new morning guy they hired was
boring.
My owner was not happy with my response and quickly told me
that "we just hired this local morning guy to talk about local events and happenings
to combat their syndicated show".
If you have not heard the Dave and Jimmy morning show, take
my word. They are good. Very good. They have a large production team working on
it every day. The show moves has high energy, and is in touch with what's
happening. Most important, Dave & Jimmy are TALENTED. My clients guy is
local but he is boring. No excitement.
No entertainment. No talent.
What's my point?
Being local is not enough. Better talent & content
always wins out. For my client, it means his local morning show will most
likely never beat Dave and Jimmy.
Just imagine what would happen if a TV station put a
"local" guy on opposite Jimmy
Kimmel. Yea, he'd be local, but viewers
would still choose Kimmel cause he's so
likable, funny and TALENTED.
I'd love to know what you think about "local" vs
"talent". Email me at gary@garyberk.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment