Plus Pages

Monday, April 11, 2022

Older, Wealthier Viewers Value TV News and Sports More


Despite the increase in cordcutting, drawing viewers away from pay-TV, interest in live news and sports—a staple of traditional linear TV—remains high among older, wealthier viewers, according to TVTechhnoloy citing a recent study from Leichtman Research Group

When asked the importance of various programming genres, overall, 49% of adults rated news as very important (8-10) and 41% rated sports as very important, LRG said. While neither of these are the highest rated genre overall––that distinction goes to movies at 69%––there are significant differences in the importance of news and sports to pay-TV subscribers versus nonsubscribers. 

The study found that:

  • 56% of pay-TV subscribers rate news as very important, compared to 32% of non-subscribers
  • 49% of pay-TV subscribers rate sports as very important, compared to 21% of non-subscribers

The rated importance of these genres is also higher among those in the demographic categories that (unsurprisingly) are typically more likely to get a pay-TV service.

News is more important among older age individuals, and in higher income households: 

  • 66% of ages 55+ rate news as very important, compared to 48% of ages 35-54, and 32% of ages 18-34 
  • 57% with annual household incomes >$75,000 rate news as very important, compared to 45% with household incomes <$75,000

Sports is more important in higher income households, as well as among men:

  • 52% with household incomes >$75,000 rate sports as very important, compared to 39% with household incomes of $30,000 - $75,000, and 27% with household incomes <$30,000
  • 49% of men rate sports as very important, compared to 34% of women

Going forward, these genres will continue to play important roles in balancing the legacy model with direct-to-consumer offerings. However these options are not mutually, LRG added, as consumers will continue to get the services and content that best serve their households’ needs and budgets.

No comments:

Post a Comment